The physical maturation of 2-year-olds can be seen in the way they seem to
lose their baby chubbiness; this is because fat is being converted to
muscle. Also, their legs lengthen and they become more upright. Their
previous toddling walk is replaced by heel to toe walking and the ability
to run and jump emerges as arches in the feet develop and their knees and
ankles gain greater flexibility (Karmiloff-Smith 1994). In relation to
their dexterity, their hand and eye coordination is progressing and the
crucial pincer grasp has long been added to the 2-year-old’s repertoire of
manual skills. Most important is the ability to use these different skills
in coordination with each other, such as being able to climb or steer
But of course it is not just the maturation of the nervous system and
muscle fibres that enables 2-year-olds to reach this level of physical
skill, it is also their insatiable appetite to explore and control their
own body and it is the physical play experiences, environment and
opportunities that support and motivate their physical learning.
In addition, such physical learning and development are, of course, closely
interlinked with all other aspects of development and learning. This is
obvious in the link between the 2-year-old’s physical development and
cognition, as physical encounters with new exciting experiences stimulate
the neural connections in their brains and the conceptual connections in
their minds as discussed earlier. Also clear is the support that growing
dexterity gives to their creativity and ability to represent as they become
skilled in the use of a range of tools for music and mark making, and so
on. Perhaps less tangible, although still highly influential, is the link
between the 2-year-old’s physical and social development. Rapidly
increasing agility and dexterity provide increased opportunities for social
interaction, as it enables them to approach, imitate, follow and retreat
from other children. They have more control over how physically close they
are to their Key Person, including being able to escape from their close
supervision! As they discover the physical control they now have and enjoy
what their bodies can do, their sense of self and confidence grows. This
can be stifled or enhanced by the disapproval or encouragement of others,
when they attempt, for example, to pour a drink at snack or go head first
down the slide.
The idea of physical activity as fostering all-round development is a
relatively new concept. Historically physical play was regarded as just
something to allow young children to “let off steam” so that then they
could then sit down and concentrate on real learning activities (Spencer,
cited in Manning-Morton and Thorp 2003). Parents and practitioners may
still encounter early years settings where this belief holds sway, even
though it is not part of written policy, nor found in government guidance
such as the EYFS (DFE 2014a) in the UK or the Pre-Birth to Three: Positive
Outcomes for Scotland’s Children and Families (Education Scotland 2010).
But the tell-tale signs can be detected in everyday practices. For example,
outdoor play may be offered for only a few short periods and planning and
resourcing of the outdoor provision given far less attention.
Practitioners’ comments such as, “Come and finish your work and then you
can go out and play” also reveal that less value is placed on running,
climbing and free movement than activities for which the child must be
Practices and provision that support physical well-being
A setting that really values physical play will not only provide rich
opportunities for this to happen outdoors but will also ensure that slides,
climbing frames, tunnels, dens and large empty boxes and crates will be
available indoors too. In the UK and some other countries, adverse weather
may deter practitioners from offering as much outdoor play as compared to
Australia, for example. However, providing suitable clothing will enable
the 2-year-old to enjoy the sensory experiences of rain drops, puddles,
wind and snow. Many settings in the UK are now adopting a “Forest school”
approach. Samuel (2012) describes how they: “seek to encourage, motivate,
engage and inspire children through positive outdoor experiences. Forest
schools are closely entwined with the concepts of free flow play and
learning from play.” In a Forest School approach, children learn through
being encouraged to be independent, free to follow their own interests, and
to engage in play that includes risk taking. A wealth of different
activities can take place outside that promote sustained concentration and
deep involvement, thereby supporting all-round development (Samuel 2012).
Other practitioners are introducing “Developmental Movement Play” into
their settings (Greenland 2009). Practitioners and students of early
childhood will be familiar with fostering the development of the five main
senses. However, there are also the vestibular and proprioceptive senses to
be mindful of. As LeVoguer and Pasch (2014; 100) point out: “the vestibular
sense is a balance mechanism…dedicated to posture, equilibrium, muscle tone
and spatial orientation”. Goddard-Blythe (2004) asserts that providing rich
opportunities for movement alongside good nutrition supports children’s
learning and aids them in becoming well balanced in all aspects of
development. As Greenland (2005) found, without a strong movement
vocabulary children may have limited expressive ability, inappropriate
reactions to the environment and an inability to integrate cognitive skills
with motor and sensory skills; this adversely affects how fluidly they can
Developmental Movement Play emphasizes two important aspects of movement:
opportunities for children to revel in child-led, free-flow spontaneous
movement play, and attention to specific early movement patterns and
activities that appear to prompt neurological development. This play is
concerned with facilitating the following ways of moving: floor play on
backs and tummies; belly crawling; crawling; pulling, pushing, stretching,
hand buffeting; and spinning, tipping and tilting (Greenland 2009). Each of
these is identified as having neurological and other developmental
benefits. For example, belly crawling is beneficial for stimulating
horizontal eye tracking and the nerves that pull the eyes into alignment
(Greenland 2009). It also strengthens the arches in the feet and promotes
stability of the neck, spine and hips and gives rise to a feeling of
“vertical through-ness which helps the child to feel grounded” (Pasch 2013:
3). Crawling promotes eye-hand coordination, helps shoulder, hip and wrist
rotation and supports the development of connections between the brain’s
two hemispheres, whose functions include memory retrieval, sorting and
sequencing (Pasch 2013).
Therefore, floor play on backs and on tummies seems to be of fundamental
importance and advantageous if embedded in continuous provision.
Pedagogically, movement play incorporates theories of sensory integration
with dance theories (Sherborne 1990) and free-flow play (Bruce 2001). It
sees movement as our first language and as a direct way of communicating
throughout the lifespan (Fraleigh 1999; LaBarre 2001; Bloom 2006), all of
which add weight to the argument for active exploration and against
expecting young children to sit at activities in order for valuable
learning to take place.
Karmiloff-Smith, A. (1994) Baby, It’s You. London: Ebury Press.
Manning-Morton, J. and Thorp, M. (2003) Key Times for Play: The First Three Years. Maidenhead: Open
University Press/McGraw-Hill Education.
DFE (Department for Education) (2014a) Statutory Framework for the Early Years Foundation Stage. Setting the
Standards for Learning, Development and Care for Children from Birth to Five. Available at:
Education Scotland (2012)
Pre-birth to Three: Positive Outcomes for Scotland’s Children and
. Available at:
Samuel, P. (2012) Outdoor Learning: Forest School Approach.
Greenland, P. (2005)
Developmental Movement Play: Emerging Themes from a Six Year
Project Exploring Physical Development Practice in the Early Years. Leeds: JABADO Publications
Greenland, P. (2009)
Developmental Movement Play: Final Report and Recommendations from a
10-year Action Research Project Investigating the Way the Early Years
Sector Supports the Youngest Children to be Fully Physical
. Available at:
LeVoguer, M. and Pasch, J. (2014) Physical well-being: autonomy and risk
taking, in J. Manning-Morton (ed.) Exploring Well-being in the Early Years. Maidenhead: Open
University Press/McGraw-Hill Education.
Goddard-Blythe, S. (2004) The Well Balanced Child: Movement and Early Learning. Stroud:
Pasch, J. (2013) Emotion, mastery and meaning – getting connected in the
early years. Paper presented at the Expect the Best Conference, June, 2013.
Sherborne, V. (1990) Developmental Movement for Children.
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Bruce, T. (2001) Learning through Play: Babies, Toddlers and the Foundation Years.
London: Hodder and Stoughton.
Fraleigh, S.H. (1999) Dancing into Darkness: Butoh, Zen, and Japan
. Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh Press.
LaBarre, F. (2001)
On Moving and Being Moved: Nonverbal Behaviour in Clinical Practice. Hillsdale, NJ: Analytic Press.
Bloom, K. (2006) The Embodied Self: Movement and Psychoanalysis. London: Karnac Books.
Julia Manning-Morton and Maggie Thorp were previously Senior Lecturers in
Early Childhood Studies at London Metropolitan University and are currently
independent consultants at Key Times Professional Development. Their
Two-year-olds in early years settings – Journeys of Discovery
is available for purchase.